Energy Blue Print

future costs of electricity generation

Figure 28 shows that the introduction of renewable technologies under the energy [r]evolution scenario will by 2010 already be reducing the cost of electricity generation compared to the reference scenario. Once the cost of CO2 emissions has been taken into account from 2020 onwards, the cost difference will be about 1 cent/kWh, increasing to almost 2 cents/kWh in 2050. Note that any increase in fossil fuel prices beyond the projection given in Table 3 is a further burden on fossil fuel generation and therefore increases the gap between the two scenarios.

Due to growing demand, the India region will face a significant increase in its expenditure on electricity supply. Under the reference scenario, the unchecked growth in demand, the increase in fossil fuel prices and the cost of CO2 emissions result in total electricity supply costs rising from today’s $50 billion per year to more than $400 bn in 2050. Figure 29 shows that the energy [r]evolution scenario not only complies with global CO2 reduction targets but also helps to stabilise energy costs and relieve the economic pressure on society. Increasing energy efficiency and shifting energy supply to renewables leads to long term costs for electricity supply that are 35% lower than in the reference scenario. It becomes clear that pursuing stringent environmental targets in the energy sector also pays off in terms of economics.


Institute DLR, Institute of Technical Thermodynamics, Department of Systems Analysis and Technology Assessment, Stuttgart, Germany
Ecofys BV, P.O. Box 8408, NL-3503 RK Utrecht, Kanaalweg 16-G

Regional Partners: OECD North America WorldWatch Institute; Greenpeace USA Latin America University of Sao Paulo; Greenpeace Brazil; OECD Europe European Renewable Energy Council; Transition Economies Vladimir Tchouprov Africa & Middle East Reference Project: “Trans-Mediterranean Interconnection for Concentrating Solar Power” 2006; Greenpeace Mediterranean; South Asia Rangan Banerjee, Bangalore, India; Greenpeace India; East Asia ISEP-Institute Tokyo; Greenpeace South East Asia; China Prof. Zhang Xilian, Tsinghua University, Beijing; Greenpeace China; OECD Pacific ISEP-Institute Tokyo, Japan; Dialog Institute,Wellington, New Zealand; Greenpeace Australia Pacific; Greenpeace New Zealand